Dawkins & Gowens Law Firm

Attorneys at Law

An Oklahoma Workers' Compensation and Personal Injury Litigation Group

“We want to help”




Uber's version of workers’ comp: Innovative or insufficient?

To say Uber has experienced “growing pains” in their relatively short existence would be the definition of an understatement. Controversial disputes with Google, hostile workplace scandals, and high-level resignations (most recently, their CEO) have tarnished the image of the rideshare company.

While the federal government does not provide data on Uber drivers, their statistics reveal that counterpart taxi operators are as likely to suffer injuries on the job as workers in dangerous logging and mining industries are. More alarming, those drivers share the likelihood of being killed on the job with police officers.

Yet, unlike taxi drivers, Uber operators were not entitled to workers compensation benefits. Far too often, they had to rely on their own health insurance to pay medical bills.

Recently, Uber seemed to come around on the issue. In June, the ride-sharing service partnered with OneBeacon and Aon insurance companies to pilot a voluntary, low-cost option that would provide injured drivers in eight states the chance to recoup their wages and cover medical expenses. The plan sets aside $3.75 per-mile of their compensation. Uber is offsetting those costs by raising rates.

Howeverr, what Uber considers coverage for drivers may slightly resemble workers’ compensation, but it falls short in many areas, as evidenced by the all-caps headline on the policy’s first page.


Differences exist and include:

  • The plan is optional and drivers must pay for it. By law in most states, workers’ compensation insurance for traditional employees is both mandatory and paid for directly by the employer.
  • Workers’ compensation commonly pays out two-thirds of salary for injured employees until they are able to return to their job. Uber’s policy maxes out at half of a driver’s average weekly earnings.
  • The policy allows the insurer to deny coverage at their doctors’ discretion.
  • While traditional workers comp has an appointed State Board that handles disputes, Uber requires a binding arbitration proceeding. Their drivers’ effectively forfeit their rights to appear before a board and file an individual or class action lawsuit.
  • The policy’s language contains a preemptive denial of permanent disability coverage for mental health and trauma.
  • No survivor’s benefits in the event of an accident.

Some see a step in the right direction. Other’s see it as yet another example of Uber wanting to continue playing by their own rules,

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
Email Us For A Response

No Recovery, No Fee. Contact Our Firm Today

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Our Location

Dawkins & Gowens Law Firm
1601 NW Expressway, Suite 1210
Oklahoma City, OK 73118

Toll Free: 800-542-4424
Phone: 405-848-4444
Fax: 405-843-1246
Oklahoma City Law Office Map